What the Bible Says about Socialism

The Law of Moses took care of those in dire need. In Deut. 26 12 (NIV) , the Bible in the Law of Moses taught 

"When you have finished setting aside a tenth of all your produce in the third year, the year of the tithe, you shall give it to the Levite, the foreigner, the fatherless and the widow, so that they may eat in your towns and be satisfied." 

It is socialistic to the extent that one-tenth of the harvest was taxed by law, redistributed to the dire poor; but the tax was capped at 10% as to not be an undue burden on the nation’s economy. In other words, socialism was both allowed, and controlled by the tithe law.

Another socialistic program in the Law of Moses can be found in Deut. 15:1-2. (NIV) “At the end of every seven years you must cancel debts.  This is how it is to be done: Every creditor shall cancel any loan they have made to a fellow Israelite. They shall not require payment from anyone among their own people, because the LORD’s time for canceling debts has been proclaimed”.

According to the Law of Moses, the affluent had to release the poor from their debts every seven years. Debt cancellation is another form of wealth redistribution and socialism found in the Bible. In this example, socialism was allowed, but could be limited by the affluent in how much they loaned out.

In Deut. 23:19, 24, 25, we see a couple of more examples of social programs in the Law of Moses. (NIV) “19 Do not charge a fellow Israelite interest, whether on money or food or anything else that may earn interest.” The affluent were not allowed to charge interest on their brother and sister Israelites. 

24 “If you enter your neighbor’s vineyard, you may eat all the grapes you want, but do not put any in your basket. 25 If you enter your neighbor’s grain field, you may pick kernels with your hands, but you must not put a sickle to their standing grain.” 

This form of socialism and wealth redistribution was authorized by the Bible in the Law of Moses in that anyone including the poor had access to anyone else’s field to go and eat; however, they could not harvest it or haul it off. If they did, it would be stealing. 

Lastly, another example of socialism and wealth distribution can be found in the Bible in Leviticus 23:22 (NIV) 22 “‘When you reap the harvest of your land, do not reap to the very edges of your field or gather the gleanings of your harvest. Leave them for the poor and for the foreigner residing among you. I am the LORD your God.” The affluent were legally required to not harvest the corners of their field, so that the poor could eat from it.

The Bible in the Law of Moses itself recognizes that an involuntary wealth tax of 10% does not go far enough. In Deut. 15:11, the Bible in the Law of Moses recognizes the need for the general public to voluntarily give to those in need. (NIV) “There will always be poor people in the land. Therefore I command you to be openhanded toward your fellow Israelites who are poor and needy in your land.” 

Jesus fully supported the Law of Moses and the tithe in Luke 11:42; therefore, Jesus would have to be socialistic in His thinking as far as the Law of Moses goes. (NIV) “Woe to you Pharisees (religious leaders) because you give God a tenth of your mint, rue and all other kinds of garden herbs, but you neglect justice and the love of God. You should have practiced the latter without leaving the former undone.” 

In other words, Jesus taught that the Jews had fulfilled the involuntary tithe law; however, they had not practiced justice by voluntarily open handed giving as instructed in the Bible in the Law of Moses by giving to their poor brothers and sisters like instructed to do in Deut. 15:11.

Throughout the ministry of Christ, Jesus emphasized voluntary giving to the poor which the Jewish establishment of His day was overlooking. 

In Matthew 25:42-46 Jesus said 42 "For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’ 44 “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’ 45 “He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’ 46 “Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.” 

Jesus taught that to voluntarily give to our poor brothers and sisters in Christ is a true test of those who really belong to Him.

How does your church make decisions?

Have you ever sat in the pew, and wondered how in the world did my Church come up with that decision?

If some strange decisions are being made in your Church, maybe your Church is being run more like a business than a ministry. 

As in any organization, there are a limited number of resources such as seats, meeting space, and parking.

Could it be that your Church is trying to improve their average earnings per member through the decisions that they are making? 

Did you know that if their earnings per member go up then they can afford more attractive buildings and staff increases, so they can attract even more affluent members.

On and on it goes. I hope and pray that this does not describe your Church.

Even if I were affluent, I wouldn’t want to be favored because I had money.

My hope would be that I was being loved and appreciated by authentic people, and not loved because they perceived me to be an affluent giver. 

Look at the decisions that your Church’s leadership is making through a revenue perspective, and then think through what they are doing.

Then, those decisions that they’re making might make some sense. I'm not saying that it's happening in your Church, but it might. 

In some cases, a revenue perspective is the only thing that might make sense. Is your Church a Business or a Ministry? Look through revenue glasses.

To help clear things up, ask…

1. Does your Church’s leadership favor the affluent over others?

2. Does your Church’s leadership rush the new members who are affluent into leadership roles?

3. Does your Church pursue affluent prospects over everyone else?

4. Does your Church have a good representation of the less fortunate in your Church?

5. Does your Church rush to help the Church members who are in crisis, including job loss?

6. Does your Church encourage personal giving to the poor especially to your brothers and sisters in Christ?

7. Are the affluent in your Church taught to be caring with those in your fellowship and elsewhere who are less fortunate?

8. Does your Church encourage their members to cross socio-economic barriers?

9. Does your Church separate the affluent from the less fortunate even in worship?

My hope is that your Church is a ministry and not a business. If not, seek the Lord’s leading in what He’d have you to do.

Matthew 6:24 (CEB) “No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be loyal to the one and have contempt for the other. You cannot serve God and wealth”.